|
Council
Tax Abolition and Service Tax Introduction (Scotland) Bill
The UNISON Scotland Evidence
To the Scottish Parliament Local Government and Transport Committee
September 2005
Introduction
UNISON Scotland's largest public sector trade union
representing over 150,000 members. UNISON Scotland welcomes the
opportunity to submit evidence to the Local Government and Transport
Committee. Recent rises in Council Tax bills and forthcoming revaluation
has put local government funding back on the political agenda. UNISON
believes that the plans to replace Council Tax with a Scottish Service
Tax will do nothing to make taxation fairer as claimed. It would
in fact move the burden of taxation from all households to those
in work and would weaken local democracy through the setting of
a national rate. UNISON believes that a property-based tax is the
best way to fund local services. It is a reasonable indicator of
wealth and is simple to collect. It would be more efficient to fix
the current bands and modify the Council Tax Benefit system than
to reorganise local taxation again.
Taxation in the UK
The Scottish Socialist party's proposal for a Service
Tax is based on a belief that taxing income is fairer than a tax
on property. This demonstrates widely held misunderstanding of the
taxation system in the UK. While it is not in dispute that the richest
pay 2% of their income on Council Tax and the poorest 5%, if all
of UK taxation is brought together then almost all income groups
pay between 32% and 37% of their incomes on tax. That does not mean
that the system is fair. Taxes such as VAT have no link what so
ever to ability to pay. Property is though a reasonable proxy for
household wealth. Placing more tax on income rather than property
will move more of the cost of local government onto those in work
and will do nothing to increase the share that the really wealthy
pay.
Maintaining a wide base for taxation and placing tax
on different things like property, earnings and spending is a key
way of spreading the burden of taxation across society. Exempting
a form of wealth such as property could in fact increase rather
than decrease inequalities. Property is therefore an important part
of the "taxation basket".
Income Based Taxation
The proposed Scottish Service Tax would shift the
burden onto working families. The current debates around the Council
tax are often focused on a belief that income tax is a better indicator
of ability to pay. While some families do have a higher gross income
than many pensioners do they also have many costs such as mortgages,
rent, childcare and the general costs of food clothing and heating
needed to raise a family. This leaves many with less disposable
income than pensioners who own their properties out right and have
no dependants.
The SSP claim that 86% of Glasgow Council tax payers
would be better off under the Service tax but these figures are
based on an assumption of one earner per household. The SSP's figures
indicate that dual income-households with earning of £43,000 (2
average earners) would be worse off under their proposals. Like
the Poll Tax, that the Council Tax replaced, every earner in the
house would be liable for a service tax. The more workers in your
house the more tax you would pay.
Property Based Taxation
A property tax is difficult to avoid. You cannot hide
your house or its value. You cannot move it abroad or to a tax shelter.
Even those who live abroad and do not pay UK income tax pay Council
Tax on their UK property. Under a Service tax they would pay nothing
and still get their bins emptied.
There is also an obvious link to local government;
you pay a property tax to the area you live for the services in
your area. Property tax is also simple to calculate and collect.
You only need the property band and whether or not one or more people
live there to work out the bill. Service tax would involve self-assessment
for non PAYE groups like pensioners. It would also make the income
tax system more costly to administer, as all the tax -free allowances
would be different.
Democracy
Currently councils set their own Council Tax rates
and are accountable to local electors for this rate and the value
for money they deliver in terms of local services. The Service tax
rate would be set nationally and so be the same across Scotland,
this would weaken the accountability of local government to its
payers. A national rate would also make more difficult for areas
to pursue their own priorities. Currently only 30 % of those from
lower social classes think they can influence decision making in
their local area this compares to 47% for higher classes. Turnout
at elections is also falling, particularly for local elections.
Removing the link to locally set taxes will further alienate people
from the democratic process.
Stability
Property tax is a good form of local taxation, not
only because the link is obvious, you pay it to the council where
your house is but also because it is reasonably stable. Houses are
fixed in place, new ones take time to build and old ones don't disappear
over night. Councils can therefore predict income with reasonable
certainty over long periods of time. Councils can therefore plan
for the long term and vital services have secure funding.
UNISON also believes that the proposals for the Service
Tax give far too little thought to the future of the current staff
involved in administering the Council Tax. To state "No worker
should be made redundant as a result of this bill." hardly
covers the cost and complexity of re-deploying a whole department,
even if such a policy was deliverable without redundancy.
Improving the Council Tax
UNISON does not support the status quo and believes
that a reform of the current system is essential. The current band
system limits how much those with more expensive properties contribute.
A £400,000 household pays three times the rate of a £40,000 house
not ten times. This is why Council Tax takes up a higher proportion
of low incomes than high, not because it is a property tax. A new
banding system is needed particularly with a wider range of top
and bottom bands and a change in the multiplier rate between bands.
Property values have altered radically since the original
bands were set, regular re-evaluation of the band would also be
required to ensure the system continues to match wealth with bills.
Council Tax Benefit
In order to address concerns about the Council Tax
Council Tax Benefit needs overhauled. CTB, like all means
tested benefits, is not always claimed by or available to those
it is intended to protect. It is estimated that there is £ 1.2 billion
in unclaimed council tax benefit across the UK. Although half of
the 4.7 million recipients are pensioners only 65% of all pensioners
and 45% of owner-occupier pensioners are actually claiming. They
are losing on average £7.60 per week.
While much of the publicity has centred round pensioners
the CTB system actually hits working families the hardest. Many
low paid workers have to pay full Council Tax. Just under half the
children living in poverty live in households not entitled to CTB.
The table below shows just little those paying full Council Tax
can earn. The table also shows how complex the system is particularly
its relationship with the Tax Credit system. It is therefore no
surprise that one sixth of working age households who are eligible
do not claim.
|
Household type
|
Gross weekly earnings at which CTB is 0
|
Net weekly income after housing costs
|
Poverty line
|
|
Single under 25
|
135
|
60
|
105
|
|
Single 25 or over
|
150
|
95
|
105
|
|
Lone parent
|
130
|
205
|
195
|
|
Couple
|
225
|
140
|
190
|
|
Parent couple
|
225
|
240
|
280
|
Even for those who do claim the cut off rate is really
steep: On earnings over £60 per week CTB falls by about 20p for
every pound earned. This can put people off changing to better paid
jobs, doing over time or even staring work in the first place.
Households with children start to pay Council Tax
before National Insurance or Income Tax.
Business Rates
UNISON also believes that business rates should be
returned to local control, grant support should be allocated with
the minimum of ring fencing and that their should be a level playing
field between local authority borrowing and private finance.
Conclusion
In summary UNISON believes that the Council Tax provides
a stable yield for local councils at low administrative cost. It
should be improved to make it more progressive through revaluation,
changes to the banding and Council Tax Benefit reform. The non-property-based
alternatives (Local Income Tax and Service Tax) are administratively
complex and easier for the wealthiest members of society to avoid.
They would not make our tax system fairer
For further information please contact:
Matt Smith, Scottish Secretary
UNISON Scotland
UNISON House
14, West Campbell Street,
Glasgow G2 6RX
Tel 0845 355 0845 Fax 0141 342 2835
e-mail matt.smith@unison.co.uk
Submissions index | Home
|