|
Road User ChargingConsultation
on Exemption Regulations Under Section 54 of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2001UNISON
Scotland's response to the Scottish Executive's Consultation on the Exemption
Regulations Under Section 54 of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2001February
2004 Executive Summary - UNISON
Scotland fully recognises that there may be a case for congestion charging schemes
in Scotland. However, such schemes must be seen to be fair to all communities.
- We fully recognise that charging schemes should only be introduced when a
range of alternative transport improvements is in place.
- We
support the proposal that there should be fair treatment for those people who
pay the charge.
- We believe that essential public service workers
should be included in a national minimum exemption.
IntroductionUNISON
is Scotland's largest trade union representing over 145,000 members working in
the public sector. Our members are employed in local government, the health service,
care services, water authorities, and in the voluntary sector. We welcome the
opportunity to respond to the Scottish Executive's consultation document on Exemption
Regulations Under Section 54 of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2001. This
paper constitutes UNISON Scotland's response to the consultation document issued
by the Scottish Executive on Exemption Regulations Under Section 54 of the Transport
(Scotland) Act 2001. ResponseThe
UNISON Scotland response to the questions are as follows: - Annex
A Question 1 Do
you think that there should be any groups of people; classes of vehicles; or types
of activity that we should include in our national minimum exemptions from
road user charging schemes? . What
should they be? In addition to the list already in the draft
regulation please consider adding essential Local Government services such as
Social Workers and Home Carers. National Health Service workers and patients should
also be exempted. .
Why should they be exempted? These key public services
provide a fundamental part in day to day life across Scotland. This group of workers
provides an essential public service and lifeline to every community, regardless
of geographical boundaries, across Scotland. .
What might the impact of their exemption from road user charging schemes be
on traffic levels/ congestion and/ or noise emissions? There
would be a minimal impact from this as this group of workers is not disproportionate
to the key services that they carry out. Question 2 Do
you think that there should be any groups of people; classes of vehicles; or types
of activity that should not be exempted from road user charging schemes? .
What should they be? Individuals if based solely on administrative
boundaries and other ‘non transport related' geographical boundaries. .
Why should they not be exempted? These individuals cause
as much congestion travelling around the charging area as any one coming in from
out the area. Congestion charging regulations cover vehicle classifications and
do not refer to groups of people. .
What might the impact of their non-exemption from road user charging schemes
be on traffic levels/ congestion and/ or noise emissions? This
should encourage them to use public transport to carry out their trips to help
reduce congestion and thereby reduce emissions. If they continue to use their
car then they will be contributing to the congestion. Conclusion
UNISON Scotland believes that road
user charging schemes should be fair for all communities across Scotland. UNISON
Scotland also believes that essential Local Government service and National Health
Service workers should be included in the national minimum exemptions. 
For Further Information Please Contact:Matt
Smith, Scottish Secretary UNISONScotland UNISON House 14, West
Campbell Street, Glasgow G2 6RX Tel 0141-332 0006 Fax 0141 342 2835 e-mail matt.smith@unison.co.uk
|