UNISON home
UNISONScotland www
This is our archive website that is no longer being updated.
For the new website please go to
www.unison-scotland.org
Join UNISON
Join UNISON
Click here
Home News About us Join Us Contacts Help Resources Learning Links UNISON UK

 

 

 

  Higher Education
 

Pay and Conditions

Top of page Pay & Conditions Options

For pay and conditions, there are three possible main options for Higher Education in Scotland and the Scottish Pay and Conditions Sub Committee will want to consider the benefits and disadvantages of each together with the implications, for both Scotland and the rest of the UK, of adopting one of them:

* All HE Institutions in Scotland could become party to a set of arrangements for pay and/or conditions which are common to the whole of the UK;

* Scottish HE Institutions could collectively adopt a set of arrangements for pay and/or conditions which are separate from those for the rest of the UK;

* HE Institutions in Scotland could elect to maintain the current mix of arrangements for pay and conditions based principally on those negotiated by UCEA and the CSCFC.

One of the key issues that the Review has to tackle is the arguments for harmonisation of conditions of service and there are two dimensions to this;

  • harmonisation across HE Institutions
  • and harmonisation across staff groups.

The main Review Committee will need advice on the Scottish dimension of this, particularly as regards;

Whether there are strong views in Scotland about harmonisation of conditions across HE Institutions and/or across staff groups;

Whether there is a clear preference for or against harmonisation across Scottish Universities and Colleges (for all or some staff groups), irrespective of what might be proposed for the rest of the UK.

A staff survey has been carried out on behalf of the main Committee by its Data Sub Group and a paper providing a detailed analysis of early results has been tabled at the most recent meeting of the Scottish Sub Committee.

Members of the Scottish Sub Committee are invited to:

  • Comment upon the degree to which the results confirm or refute any preconceived ideas on the staffing of HE Institutions in general and Scottish Institutions in particular;
  • Suggest any particular analyses and representations of data for Scottish Institutions which they think would highlight the particular important points;
  • Identify key messages to be borne in mind for the Sub Committee's further work.

UNISON is represented on the National Committee by Elaine Harrison, Head of Higher Education at Mabledon Place and on the Scottish Sub Committee by
Allan Wilson, Head of Higher Education (Scotland).

Working Party

The Higher Education Service Group nationally is overseeing the work of the National Committee and the Scottish Higher Education Service Group has established a Working Party from its number, comprising

  • Hugh Maguiness, Paisley University,
  • Danny Rafferty, Glasgow Caledonian University,
  • Frances Buchanan, Strathclyde University
  • Kate Muir, Heriot Watt University

who, together with Allan Wilson, will assist the deliberations of the Scottish Sub Committee.

ALLAN WILSON
Head of Higher Education (Scotland)


Top of page

 

Top of page

Conditions Critical Campaign

Negotiations on pay and industrial relations in higher education

As a result of a series of negotiations which concluded in the early morning of 11 May, after a final 15 hour session of talks, important progress has been made towards resolving the outstanding dispute in HE on pay and conditions, and also towards the establishment of a new NJC for the sector as a whole as recommended by the Bett Report.

A package of proposals has been assembled covering pay for all staff in the sector up to 31 July 2002, along with detailed proposals on the establishment of a new National Joint Committee.

The University & Colleges Employers Association (UCEA) have made clear that the offer on pay, which provides for phased increases leading to a new unified settlement date for all staff of 1 August from 2002 onwards is conditional on acceptance of the whole package of proposals and full settlement of the current dispute.

All the HE unions will now be consulting their members. A further meeting between UCEA and all the unions is to be held on 25 June.

Top of page

 

11 April 2001

EXECUTIVE REJECTS DERISORY PAY OFFER

Following further talks between the trade unions and the employers on 6 April, the following joint statement was issued:

"The employers offered common increases for all staff groups in 2001 of 3.3% or £365, whichever is the greater, with transitional arrangements to harmonise settlement dates aimed at delivering equity of treatment across staff groups. The unions considered and rejected these proposals as inadequate to meet their current aspirations in relation to the current and coming year. It was agreed that the proposals would be explored further by both sides with a view to reaching final conclusions at a meeting on 10 May."

During negotiations it had been suggested that the current pay review dates of April, July and September should all be moved to 1 August. An example given would only have given 2 pence per hour increase to manual workers in ‘old' universities between 1 April and 1 August. This was rejected. Further joint work is continuing on this issue.

The Executive met on 10 April to consider the situation. Members expressed dismay that the employers had not made any reference to the current dispute around the pay offer for 2000. Also they had not adequately addressed the low levels of pay in the sector.

The executive made the following decision:

  • UNISON would continue to suspend the current industrial action until the next meeting of the Executive to give the employers the opportunity to respond differently to the 2000 claim.
  • To go forward from 10 May to ballot for industrial action on the 2001 pay offer if it is not substantially improved to meet the Bett recommendations on pay. Also to resume and escalate the current industrial action short of strike for the year 2000 campaign

The Executive will meet again on 14 May to consider the outcome of the next round of talks.

Branches should make preparations to resume the action after 14 May should this be necessary.

Top of page

20 February 2001

The national action short of strike action in Higher Education has been suspended to allow talks to take place from 15 February.

The action, involving members working to rule, and boycotting overtime as well as a rally and many other events (see page 1) has been successful in bringing the employers back to the negotiating table and getting them to accept there was a problem. Any proposals arising from the talks will be put to the membership.

Carol Judge, Scottish Organiser for Higher and Further Education said: "In addition to re-starting the national negotiations, we in Scotland also need to focus on the new Scottish sub-committee of the bargaining machinery.

"For the first time we have a place where all higher education trade unions and all employers can meet, face the challenges of 'life-long learning' and deal with the Minister, the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council, and the Scottish Parliament's Enterprise and Lifelong Learning Committee.”

Top of page

4 December 2000

HIGHER EDUCATION - INDUSTRIAL ACTION

RALLIES
Detailed on a separate sheet (click here) are confirmation of all the Rallies that are now taking place across Scotland on 5 December 2000. Hopefully, UNISON will have a sizeable presence at all Rallies and I do know the challenge with the organisation and motivation of members to attend given some of the difficulties in venues. However, all the hard work that has taking place in the last 10 days, I am sure will pay off.

PETITIONS
I understand that all the unions, except UNISON, have agreed to the text of a petition that is now currently circulating and I am trying to check the details of the reasons why UNISON is unable to support. However, you may wish to encourage members to support an alternative petition and I would be obliged if you would consider this matter.

MEETING WITH SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE MINISTER FOR ENTERPRISE AND LIFELONG LEARNING - WENDY ALEXANDER
The EIS was given the task of liaising with the Minister's office to seek a meeting with the unions in Higher Education in Scotland. However, a verbal response on her behalf has been received which indicates that pay and related matters is not an issue for the Scottish Executive, but with the employer. Nevertheless, we are going to make further representations to say that there are issues affecting Higher Education and given that in Scotland, the Scottish Executive is the funding body, then we do believe there are a number of matters, including how the Bett Report is implemented, can be pursued. I will keep you updated on progress in this matter.

SCOTTISH HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL
The full time officers of all the unison consider it viable to seek a meeting with the Funding Council under the auspices of the STUC and will make approaches to the STUC to facilitate such a meeting in late January recognising the Funding Council is given the task of distributing the monies to Higher Education Institutions in Scotland and also advising the Minister of all matters. There could then be scope to pursue certain matters via the Funding Council. Again, I will keep you updated on developments.

INDUSTRIAL ACTION
You will have received separately, circulars from national level giving the list of options available for branches to encourage members to take action short of strike action. In Scotland, in consultation with John Lambie, Assistant Scottish Secretary responsible for industrial action, it is necessary for the Region to keep accurate records of what action is being taken in branches. I would, therefore, ask that all branches before commencing industrial action, complete the attached form giving details of the action being taken, the members involved and the impact on the employer. Should you require any assistance in completing the information, please in the first instance, liaise with your appropriate Regional Officer. It would also be helpful if you could keep us updated should any of that information vary or change. You will then be notified that the action has been endorsed at Scottish level and can commence.

STATEMENT FROM LECTURERS
You will have received separately a copy of the text that the Lecturer trade unions have agreed that their members will read out on 5 December to students to explain what the industrial action is about. The NUS were very keen to have such a statement to ensure maximum support from students and they have welcomed the text.

MEMBERS COVERED BY THE INDUSTRIAL ACTION
I write to remind you that only those members who were balloted and the employers notified of taking industrial action can be involved in the action short of strike action. Again, should you require any clarification, in the first instance please liaise with your Regional Officer who will endeavour to get any queries dealt with at national level. However, previous correspondence did detail all the employers that were notified of the ballot and that list stands for those affected by taking industrial action.

The Scottish Higher Education Service Group are conscious that there are members employed in Higher Education that were not balloted and, therefore, not covered by industrial action. However, we do hope that branches will endeavour to ensure that they can be kept fully informed of what is going on and where there are further Rallies and other events, then they can be encouraged to participate without in any way being seen to be taking any form of industrial action.

FOLLOW-UP MEETING
A further meeting of the full time officers has been scheduled for Tuesday, 30 January 2001. However, at this time it only involves those unions who are taking industrial action. This, in Scotland, means the exemption of the AUT from that meeting. The aim will be to review the industrial action and what progress is being made and any response received from the employer.

Branches will be kept up to date on developments as they apply in Scotland.

Yours sincerely

CAROL A JUDGE
Scottish Organiser Higher and further Education

Top of page

22 November 2000

UNISON VOTES YES FOR ACTION SHORT OF A STRIKE

Action to start on 5 December with day of rallies and demonstrations - followed by work to rule and overtime bans

The Higher Education Service Group Executive met on 21 November 2000 to consider the results of the national ballot on industrial action.

The results of the ballot were as follows:

Question 1 - "Are you prepared to take part in strike action?” over 47% Yes.

Question 2 - "Are you prepared to take part in action short of a strike?” - 72% Yes.

The National Executive Council Industrial Action Committee has agreed to a campaign of action short of a strike. The other higher education unions will be taking action along with UNISON.

Industrial action will commence on 5 December with a day of demonstration and rallies across the country, launching discontinuous disruption which will include withholding student marks, working to contract, work to rule, and overtime bans. The action will continue until a settlement is reached and has the full support of the National Union of Students.

Detailed advice on the action will be sent to branches, along with publicity material.

The decision follows the employers' refusal to negotiate nationally on terms and conditions, or honour the recommendations of the Bett Report.

HE members are angry at the contempt with which national employers are dismissing an important report into pay and industrial relations, according to Carol Judge (Scottish Organiser, Higher & Further Education)

"The Bett Report showed enormous gaps in pay between jobs in HE and market rates”, she said.

"The bargaining machinery was out of date, new pay structures were needed and more. However the national employers simply imposed a rejected 3% (4% for manual staff) offer with no agreement, ignoring the recommendations of the Bett Report.”

Affected universities

The Scottish Universities affected are those traditionally known as the 'old' universities - but not all employees of these are included. Members are requested to check with their Branch Secretary if they are not clear whether they are on National University Conditions.

Top of page

 


To: Secretaries of Higher Education Branches

24 November 2000

Dear Colleague

ADVICE ON ACTION SHORT OF A STRIKE

Members have voted overwhelmingly (72%) to take part in industrial action short of a strike. The other higher education unions voted in a similar manner showing that 3 out of 4 university and college staff are willing to take industrial action about pay and the implementation of the Bett proposals. The National Executive Council Industrial Action Committee has agreed that UNISON, members should take action short of a strike commencing on the 5th December 2000, with lunchtime demonstrations and rallies.

Members should be asked to do the following:

  • Keep to start and finish times
  • Not work beyond contracted hours
  • Take lunch and other break entitlements
  • Claim time off in lieu when it is owed
  • Refuse favours outside normal duties
  • Not to cover for vacant posts and not to accept new duties
  • Working strictly to the contract of employment

Overtime and call-out bans are now classified as action short of a strike (Employment Relations Act 1999) and can be considered in the action strategy. This form of action should be considered carefully by branches in consultation with members, since it must be recognised that many lower paid staff rely on this payment to make up their pay. Branches should establish hardship funds if they decide to consider this form of action.

There should also be an emphasis on claiming rights. Branches are advised to look at any local agreements to ensure they are being adhered to. Also health and safety regulations should be observed. This to include training requirements, local agreements and operating procedures.

A strength of the current industrial action is that campus unions are involved. Joint union meetings should be held to discuss the action.

Branches are urged to hold meetings to discuss what further action short of a strike can be taken to assist in the campaign. If branches are in any doubt about the action they propose to take they should contact the region or this section for advice.

A leaflet on the action will be sent to branches.

The joint union higher education unions are meeting again on 7 December to review the position. I hope you will do everything you can to raise the issue at local level by carrying out the actions outlined. I will keep you advised of developments.

Relations with employers

Both national and individual higher education institution employers have been officially notified of the results of the ballot and UNISON's intention to take industrial action short of a strike. A similar letter has also been sent to Student Unions where they are the direct employer of UNISON members. Some local institutions may attempt to intimidate the UNISON branch by demanding lists of the names of those taking part in strike action. You are not required to provide such lists and if you are asked refer them to this section at Mabledon Place. The letter I have sent to each institution about the action dated 24 November, sets out the staff who will be called upon to take strike action. Legally no other notice is needed.

If employers do attempt to threaten or intimidate the branch, please contact your regional officer immediately. Also contact other campus unions involved in the action to co-ordinate a response. Remember that this is joint union action. A joint approach should be made in the face of any attempt by employers to undermine the action.

Top of page


 

Report of Higher Education Service Group - Independent Review of Higher Education Pay and Conditions

The principle activity of the Higher Education Service Group is currently overseeing the work of the Scottish Sub Committee of the Independent Review of Higher Education Pay and Conditions of Service currently addressing these issues on a UK basis.

The terms of reference of the Scottish Sub Committee are to contribute to the work of the IRHEPC in respect of Higher Education Institutions and staff in Scotland, advising the Review Committee in particular on:

  • Necessary changes to those pay and conditions arrangements currently negotiated separately in Scotland;
  • Implications for Scotland on proposals being considered for application across the UK;
  • Considerations arising from the creation of the Scottish Parliament and related devolutionary steps.

Two meetings of the Scottish Sub Committee have taken place to date and a further six are planned with the intention that the Scottish Sub Committee be ready to submit its views to the main Committee by the end of January at the latest and earlier if at all possible.

The main Committee is currently reviewing all the evidence which has been submitted to the Review and will be discussing this and options for the future over the same period with the intention that conclusions are reached such that a final report can be published in the Spring of 1999.

Top of page